business law discussion post and 1 reply
General Instructions for Discussion Responses to Classmates
Create a new thread for each posting.
Use correct, complete sentences, in paragraph format, unless otherwise instructed.
Use assigned course materials to complete discussion responses.
Use in-text citations and a Reference List in APA format to cite the course resource(s) used – an in-text citation cannot exist without a corresponding Reference List, and a Reference List cannot exist without a corresponding in-text citation.
Sources to be used!!!
Overview: Tort Law – Product Liability
Read/Watch:
Review assigned materials in Week 2
Manufacturing Defect v. Design Defect
Warranties and Product Liability
Summary of Product Liability Law: click link below, please
/content/enforced/375136-M_001041-01-2192/Business Law I (Week 3) (1).pdf
Part 1:
During a monthly Lunch and Learn Seminar at TLG offices, all TLG business consultants are discussing various client cases. During the Discussion of GC’s new business, the group discusses the following question:
(1) Analyze and explain implied warranty of merchantability.
(2) Analyze and explain specifically how and why GC could be sued for breach of implied warranty of merchantability under product liability law for using EPI cleaning products to clean GC clients’ commercial property. `
Respond in paragraph format.
Part 2:
Respond to at least one colleague’s response.
“Analyze and explain the implied warranty of merchantability.
Implied warranty of merchantability is the guarantee that a product can be used for its intended purpose. The key takeaway from an implied warranty of merchantability is that a company does not have to write on the product or tell their customers the product will work for its intended use, rather the law already guarantees customers that the product will work and is up to industry standards.
Analyze and explain specifically how and why GC could be sued for breach of implied warranty of merchantability under product liability law for using EPI cleaning products to clean GC clients’ commercial property. `
GC could be sued because, under the implied warranty of merchantability, products in the market are supposed to be safe. Under the law, “Manufacturers, distributors, and vendors are held responsible for the injuries resulting from accidents caused by defective products” (Baldwin Hare & McGovern, 1998).
References: Exploring Warranties and Product Liability. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/contract-law/exploring-warranties-and-product-liability-contract-law-essay.php“
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
