database management systems 12

/in /by

Hi,

This is for a database management class I’m taking.

Here are the instructions:

Organizations maintain massive amounts of data in their databases. In some cases, they support the day to day operations. In other cases, they support reporting and advanced analysis.

For this activity, write a 2-5 page paper that addresses the following:

  • Clearly and concisely describe a database management system providing an example of one you have interacted with.
  • Discuss one advantage of a database management system.
    • Provide a specific example that illustrates your point.
  • Discuss one disadvantage of a database management system.
    • Describe what an organization can do to help minimize the disadvantage.
  • Briefly describe some other examples, addressing:
    • What have other organizations done?
    • Also, what is in current literature?
      • (CIO.COM is a good source for what’s happening in the IT industry, but there are many other sources)
    • What are the latest issues that impact database management?

You are free to cite an example from your own organization if you have current or prior work experience (provided, of course, they do not consider this information to be proprietary and confidential). If you cite an example from other sources, please list your reference.

Refer to the Module Exercises Rubric for grading criteria.

MGMT 392 1.3 Module Exercises Rubric

You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

MGMT 392 1.3 Module Exercises Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification and Analysis of the Main Issues/Problem 17237_2664

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

30.0 to >26.0 pts

Excellent (A) (27-30) Identifies and understands all of the main issues in question. Insightful, and thorough analysis of all the issues.

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

26.0 to >22.0 pts

Above-Average (B) (23-26) Identifies and understands most of the main issues in question. Thorough analysis of most of the issues.

17237_7987

Edit rating Delete rating

22.0 to >18.0 pts

Average (C) (19-22) Identifies and understands some of the issues in question. Superficial analysis of some of the issues in question.

17237_6276

Edit rating Delete rating

18.0 to >14.0 pts

Near-Failing (D) (15-18) Identifies and understands few of the issues in question. Incomplete analysis of the issues.

17237_4974

Edit rating Delete rating

14.0 to >0 pts

Failing (F) (0-14) Identifies and understands very little of the issues in question. No analysis of the issues.

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 30.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answers to Questions 17237_893

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

30.0 to >26.0 pts

Excellent (A) (27-30) Answers to questions are clear throughout. Connection with class and study material goes well beyond the obvious connections among ideas; demonstrates insight and original thinking.

17237_41

Edit rating Delete rating

26.0 to >22.0 pts

Above-Average (B) (23-26) Answers to questions present some irrelevant information on topic etc., but very little; treatment goes beyond obvious connections with class and study material.

17237_614

Edit rating Delete rating

22.0 to >18.0 pts

Average (C) (19-22) Answers to questions are vague in places; some irrelevant or distracting information.

17237_2362

Edit rating Delete rating

18.0 to >14.0 pts

Near-Failing (D) (15-18) Answers to questions are unclear and/or confusing. Treatment is very superficial; paper may be well written but says nothing.

17237_9123

Edit rating Delete rating

14.0 to >0 pts

Failing (F) (0-14) Does not address the questions. Treatment is very superficial and says very little.

17237_5360

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 30.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Strategy Choice and Justification 17237_2596

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Excellent (A) (21-25) An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected and successfully developed. Content knowledge is used correctly.

17237_6231

Edit rating Delete rating

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Above-Average (B) (17-20) An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected and moderately developed. Content knowledge used appropriately, with minor computation errors.

17237_8943

Edit rating Delete rating

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Average (C) (13-16) An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected, but minimally developed. Uses content knowledge with conceptual errors.

17237_3965

Edit rating Delete rating

12.0 to >9.0 pts

Near-Failing (D) (10-12) There is an attempt to solve the problem. Barely any strategy is applied that could lead to an answer. Rarely uses content knowledge.

17237_4390

Edit rating Delete rating

9.0 to >0 pts

Failing (F) (0-9) There is no attempt to solve the problem. No strategy is applied that could lead to an answer. Uses no content knowledge.

17237_3799

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 25.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communication, Style and Mechanics 17237_796

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

15.0 to >12.0 pts

Excellent (A) (13-15) Solution is presented in a clear and orderly manner so the reader can follow the flow of the solution and final answer.

17237_1280

Edit rating Delete rating

12.0 to >10.0 pts

Above-Average (B) (11-12) Solution is presented appropriately, but may contain a minor error. Reader can follow most of the steps in the solution and final answer.

17237_8386

Edit rating Delete rating

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Average (C) (9-10) Solution is presented appropriately, but contains conceptual errors. Solution is presented in an unclear manner. Scorer has difficulty following the sequence of steps.

17237_4959

Edit rating Delete rating

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Near-Failing (D) (7-8) Presents the problem in an unclear manner, steps are missing or out of sequence. Scorer cannot determine a sequence of steps.

17237_3979

Edit rating Delete rating

6.0 to >0 pts

Failing (F) (0-6) Does not present the problem in a manner that can be deciphered. Misuse of words throughout. Awkward sentences throughout. Difficult to attach a thought process. Poorly punctuated, misspelled words, grammatically abusive.

17237_519

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 15.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion

threshold: 5 pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 to >0 pts

Full Marks

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

0 to >0 pts

No Marks

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 5 pts

—

Additional Comments

Total Points: 100.0

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.