Option #2 (Evaluation): Evaluating a Controversial Argument
Purpose: The objective of this assignment is to practice persuasive writing, which includes the elements of logos, pathos and ethos as well as practice writing an evaluation.
Topic: Evaluations are everyday arguments that help individuals make decisions. Should I vaccinate my child? Should I become vegan? Am I spending too much time in front of the TV? These are some issues that can generate strong evaluations. To help your audience reach a decision, it is important to establish compelling criteria that weighs the evidence before leading to a judgment. A strong evaluation includes opinion based on observation and fact, not based on personal assumptions and biases.
Writing Task: Begin with research. What are some arguments people have made that you find yourself disagreeing with? You will need to choose one and write an evaluation essay disproving that argument. This argument can be a speech (maybe from a political figure), a lecture (possibly from a professor), a podcast (like Joe Rogan), a blog (choose someone credible), a tweet (our President has tons), and the list goes on. You will need to find the original source and include it in your Works Cited page. Then, do the following:
Evaluate your chosen argument with the intent to disprove it.
Tips: * Contextualize the argument. Background information will be needed, so make sure toprovideit (i.e. who, what, when, where). Be veryspecific. For example, is the tweet youâ€™re analyzing in response to a bigger issue? You will need to clearly identify the issue itself.
- *Brainstorm the argument by creating specific criteria. For instance, you might want to begin by asking, â€œDoes this argument violate any personâ€™s rights?â€ Or you might want to ask, â€œIs this argument based on biased opinion?â€ Remember, a strong evaluation is not going to be based on your personal preferences or assumptions. For example, if youâ€™re evaluating an argument against chocolate, you shouldnâ€™t argue that the writerâ€™s argument is weak because you love chocolate.
*Be persuasive by considering the logos, pathos and ethos of the argument youâ€™re evaluating. You might want to ask yourself what evidence the argument provides, how the writer of the argument tries to build credibility, and how the writer tries to appeal to the emotions of the reader. Avoid aggressive, offensivelanguage and work on your stylistic flow.
*If youâ€™re critiquing the argument, identify fallacies in the authorâ€™s line of reasoning.
*Do research. I would like you to use two credible sources: one source should be a credible media article (preferably from a newspaper or magazine) and one source should be a scholarly article (published in a scholarly journal). You must provide a Works Cited page that includes both outside sources as well as the original argument youâ€™re analyzing.
*Your evaluation should be 4-6 pages and should follow MLA rules. For more on the MLA structure, please visit the Purdue Owllink I posted on our Canvas page.