hum101 critical thinking assignment 70 points apa formated essay
Required
- Chapter 3. Van Cleave, M. (2016). Introduction to logic and critical thinking. Retrieved from https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/BookDetail.aspx?bookId=457
- Lau, J., & Chan, J. (2017). Scientific method: Modules 1-9. Retrieved from http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/sci/
Recommended
- Grewal, D. (2012, May 1). How critical thinkers lose their faith in God: Religious belief drops when analytical thinking rises. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-critical-thinkers-lose-faith-god/
- Grayling, A. C. (2011). Psychology: How we form beliefs. Nature, 474(7352), 446-447. doi:10.1038/474446a
- Popova, M. (2015, November 27). Physicist Lisa Randall on the sublime and the crucial differences between how art, science, and religion explain the universe. Retrieved from https://www.brainpickings.org/2015/10/19/lisa-randall-knocking-on-heavens-door/
Important! Read First
Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.
Option #1: Using the Scientific Method to Challenge our Thinking
Directions:
Using the concepts and ideas learned in Modules 1-9 in Lau and Chan (2017), write an essay in response to the following prompts:
- How does the scientific method aid human critical reasoning processes?
- How and why have you made assumptions or inferences on important matters, regardless of data or evidence to the contrary? Examples here might include: fad diets, telepathy, precognition, psychokinesis, vaccinations, UFOs, magnetic therapy, apparitions, cold fusion, Bigfoot, alternative forms of medicines, genetically modified plants, etc. Describe how you have thought about this issue and analyze how you could improve your critical reasoning on this issue using the scientific method.
Requirements:
- Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it is acceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources to support your inferences.
- Include at least one or two scholarly sources that are not required or recommended readings for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.
- Your paper should be four to five pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
- Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font Times New Roman.
- Include the following in your essay: a brief introduction (Links to an external site.), a conclusion (Links to an external site.), and a reference page formatted according to CSU-Global APA requirements.
Option #2: Persuasive Letter to a Friend
Directions:
Using the concepts and ideas learned in Modules 1-9 of Lau and Chan (2017), write a letter to a close relative or friend who rejects the scientific consensus on an important issue. In this letter, address the following questions:
- How would you define scientific theories and how they operate?
- Why do scientists employ the idea of falsifiability?
- How would you try to convince this person to examine the issue using the scientific method in order to come to clear and careful assessments?
- Why would you argue for engaging scientific, peer-reviewed sources on the issue?
Requirements:
- Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it is acceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources to support your inferences.
- Include at least one or two scholarly sources that are not required or recommended readings for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.
- Your paper should be four to five pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
- Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font Time New Roman.
- Include the following in your essay: a brief introduction, a conclusion, and a reference page formatted according to CSU-Global APA requirements.
Reference
Van Cleave, M. (2016). Introduction to logic and critical thinking. Retrieved from https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/BookDetail.aspx…
Rubric
HUM101 Mod 6 CT
HUM101 Mod 6 CT
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements
|
10.0 pts Meets Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
8.0 pts Approaches Expectation Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
6.0 pts Below Expectation Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
4.0 pts Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content
|
10.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. |
8.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. |
6.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. |
4.0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. |
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis
|
20.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning. |
16.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning. |
12.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning. |
8.0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning. |
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples
|
10.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. |
8.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. |
6.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. |
4.0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. |
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
|
10.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. |
8.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. |
6.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. |
4.0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. |
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style
|
10.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. |
8.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. |
6.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. |
4.0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors. |
10.0 pts
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
