hum101 portfolio project

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 25.0

The below is only for reference for the above assignment

Module 8

Option #1: Critical Thinking Paper on Issue or Problem

Select an issue or problem that you wish to investigate critically. Formulate a question or thesis (Links to an external site.) on the issue so that your research has a clear and cogent direction.

Use Paul and Elder’s (2012) intellectual standards to find a topic or problem that is clear, relevant, significant, and precise.

Now, write a paper that addresses the problem or issue via scholarly sources.
Your paper should include the following:

1. Title page: include your name, date, title of essay, and class
2. Introduction: provide a two-paragraph introduction (Links to an external site.) that frames the issue or problem carefully
3. Engagement with issue or problem using scholarly sources and the intellectual standards proposed by Paul and Elder (2012): What is the issue? Why is it significant? Why is this issue relevant to you (and/or your community)? What have you learned about the depth and breadth of the issue or problem from scholarly sources? How do the scholarly sources aid you in fair-mindedness and logic?
4. Conclusion (Links to an external site.): Reflect on your issue or problem and how the sources informed your thinking. What have you learned? How can you apply the intellectual standards and elements of reason to this issue or problem to come to creative solutions? What critical questions remain?
5. References
6. Journal Submission. Each module lecture contains a section with journal prompts that focus on reflection and application of the module content. Use the Journal Template to record your answers for each module’s prompt(s). Include these entries at the end of your Final Portfolio.

Details

• Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it is acceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources to support your inferences.
• Your paper should engage a minimum of six scholarly sources that are not required or recommended readings for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.
• Your paper should be eight to ten pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
• Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font.

Keep in mind the following milestones throughout the course designed to assist you in crafting your Final Portfolio

• Week 1: Submit Portfolio Topic (worth 25 points)
• Week 4: Submit Revised Portfolio Topic and Preliminary Outline (worth 25 points)

Refer to the Portfolio Project rubric below to understand how your project will be graded.

Option #2: Annotated Bibliography

Select an issue or problem that you wish to investigate critically. Formulate a question or thesis (Links to an external site.) on the issue so that your research has a clear and cogent direction.

Use Paul and Elder’s (2012) intellectual standards to find a topic or problem that is clear, relevant, significant, and precise.

Now, construct an annotated bibliography (Links to an external site.) that addresses the problem or issue through scholarly sources. See this example (Links to an external site.) for a good overview of how an annotated bibliography should be
constructed.
Your annotated bibliography should include the following:

1. Title page: include your name, date, title of annotated bibliography, and class
2. Introduction (Links to an external site.): provide a two-paragraph introduction that frames the issue or problem carefully
3. Annotations (Links to an external site.): Summarize the main point or arguments of each scholarly source. What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? Each annotation should be roughly one or two paragraphs in length.
4. Conclusion (Links to an external site.): Reflect on your issue or problem and how the sources informed your thinking. What have you learned? How can you apply the intellectual standards and elements of reason to this issue or problem to come to creative solutions?
5. References
6. Journal Submission. Each module lecture contains a section with journal prompts that focus on reflection and application of the module content. Use the Journal Template to record your answers for each module’s prompt(s). Include these entries at the end of your Final Portfolio.

Details

• Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it is acceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources to support your inferences.
• Your annotated bibliography should include a minimum of 15 scholarly sources that are not required or recommended readings for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.
• Your paper annotated bibliography should be eight to ten pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
• Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font.
• Refer to the Revision Checklist (Links to an external site.) for an overview of items to consider as you add final polish to your draft.

Keep in mind the following milestones throughout the course designed to assist you in crafting your Final Portfolio

• Week 1: Submit Portfolio Topic (worth 25 points)
• Week 4: Submit Revised Portfolio Topic and Preliminary Outline (worth 25 points)

Refer to the Portfolio Project rubric below to understand how your project will be graded.

Rubric

HUM101 Mod 8 PP

HUM101 Mod 8 PP

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content	40.0 to >32.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of critical thinking; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 32.0 to >24.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 24.0 to >16.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 16.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.	40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements	30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.	30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis	45.0 to >36.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of thinking and reasoning. 36.0 to >27.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of thinking and reasoning. 27.0 to >18.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of thinking and reasoning. 18.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.	45.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis and Evaluation	30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation Information is from reliable source(s); interpretation and/or evaluation is rigorous, affording a comprehensive and coherent analysis or synthesis. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation Information is from reliable source(s); interpretation and/or evaluation approaches course expectations in developing a coherent analysis or synthesis. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation Reliability or relevance of sources or information is questionable. Some interpretation and/or evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Reliability or relevance of sources or information is questionable. Little to no interpretation and/or evaluation.	30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis	35.0 to >28.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning. 28.0 to >21.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning. 21.0 to >14.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning. 14.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.	Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount! NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you. https://researchhomeworkhelp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Researchhomeowrkhelp-300x75.png 0 0 Joseph https://researchhomeworkhelp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Researchhomeowrkhelp-300x75.png Joseph2021-02-28 00:56:382021-02-28 00:56:38hum101 portfolio project DISCLAIMER Nursingpapertutor helps students cope with college assignments and write papers on a wide range of topics. We deal with academic writing, creative writing, and non-word assignments. QUICK LINKS HOME ABOUT US HOW IT WORKS SERVICES PAYMENT METHOD CONTACT US E MAIL: Support@researchhomeworkhelp.com WhatsApp: +1(209)962-2652 Online Chat 24/7 statistical tools help with a topic 14 Scroll to top