mgt300 apa formated essay 1

Essay is due sunday the 14th at midnight I would need it back no later than 10 pm to turn in.

Option #1: Case Study Analysis: Social Benefit or Social Disaster?

Read and respond to a case study to demonstrate your understanding of, and ability to apply, the most important concepts of the module, especially regarding the potential pitfalls of communication media.

Review a case study of Twitter in the 10th edition of the course textbook attached in the Module 5 folder.

In an integrated essay, analyze the case from the perspective of a business organization, providing support for your analysis by replying to each of the following:

1. Explain the advantages and drawbacks for organizations using social media to communicate with various employees, customers, or the global communities.
2. Describe how communication barriers surface when using social media versus using traditional media.
3. Outline specific steps managers should take to be sure they communicate effectively when using social media.
4. Explain rules or policies (if any) business organizations should implement for employees using social media after office hours. Be as specific as possible.
5. Discuss the communication barriers a manager might encounter when using social media to create an organizational internship program.
6. From your recent readings and experiences, suggest guidelines managers and organizations could follow.

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

• Be 3-4 pages in length.
• Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.).
• Cite a minimum of three scholarly sources, at least one of which is not provided in, or linked from, the course. The CSU-Global Library is a great place to find scholarly sources.

Write clearly and logically, as you will be graded on content, analysis, and your adherence to the tenets of good academic writing—which should be succinct where possible while also exploring the topics appropriately. Remember that you can always improve your work by providing support from outside scholarly sources, which help both to bolster your own assertions and supplement your ideas.

Business Management and Administration Library Guide
A Library Guide is available via the following link to serve as a great resource in this course for you. The Library Guide provides a variety of pre-selected databases within the library that are designed to support this specific course. Be sure to use this link throughout the course to support your assignment and discussion board research efforts: Management Library Guide (Links to an external site.)

Option #2: Case Study Analysis: Banning Email

Read and respond to a case study to demonstrate your understanding of, and ability to apply, the most important concepts of the module, especially regarding potential pitfalls of communication media.

Click the link in the course folder to review a case study of U.S. Cellular in the 10th edition of the course textbook. Next, visit the Job Search Toolkit component of the Career Center Resources (Links to an external site.) to assist with your job search.

In an integrated essay, analyze the case providing support for your analysis by including the following:

1. Critically evaluate the position that e-mail tends to be generally unproductive in the workplace.
2. Review the communication challenges of dealing with this volume of e-mail.
3. Examine the idea that job-seekers (and seekers of internships) must use the internet, and consequently email, to find a job. Discuss the implications for managers who depend on email as a form of communication and for hiring.
4. Debate the concept of e-mail “replacement” by using more of a social media tool and whether this might it be better or worse when communicating throughout the organization or to external job-seekers (and seekers of internships). Include in your argument the factors that managers, specifically, must consider.

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

• Be 3-4 pages in length.
• Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.).
• Cite a minimum of three scholarly sources, at least one of which is not provided in, or linked from, the course. The CSU-Global Library is a great place to find these scholarly sources.

Write clearly and logically, as you will be graded on content, analysis, and your adherence to the tenets of good academic writing—which should be succinct where possible while also exploring the topics appropriately. Remember that you can always improve your work by providing support from outside scholarly sources, which help both to bolster your own assertions and supplement your ideas.

Business Management and Administration Library Guide
A Library Guide is available via the following link to serve as a great resource in this course for you. The Library Guide provides a variety of pre-selected databases within the library that are designed to support this specific course. Be sure to use this link throughout the course to support your assignment and discussion board research efforts: Management Library Guide (Links to an external site.)

Rubric

MGT300 Mod 5 CT

MGT300 Mod 5 CT

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements	15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation The paper analyzes the social benefit of a social disaster case study from the perspective of a business organization or the paper analyzes the U.S. Cellular banning email case study and provides support for your position. The paper includes all of the required components as specified in the assignment, 3-4 pages in length, APA formatting, and scholarly sources. 12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.	15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content	5.0 to >2.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources, and references key concepts with in-text citations to support answers. 2.0 to >1.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 1.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 1.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.	5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking	10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in critical thinking. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis	10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis on the case study from a business perspective or support for your position on banning email. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples	10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the perspectives on the assignment. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.	10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style.	10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome MGT3007 Recognize management strategy in a globalized world. view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts	5.0 pts Meets Expectation- Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of theory; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 3.0 pts Approaches Expectation – Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 2.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 0.0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.	5.0 pts
Total Points: 75.0

10 mins ago

ATTACHMENTS

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.