i need help with my case study analysis

You are to work alone to analyze and prepare answers/solutions for the case analysis. The text should be your primary source of information for this activity.

Consolidate your response into one file and submit it to your instructor not later than Sunday midnight central time of Unit 7. Submit your Case Analysis assignment by uploading it to this page.

Case Analysis Method

To begin your Case Analysis, examine the MG371 Case: Growth Pains at Mountain States Healthcare.

Your paper should contain at a minimum:

PART 1 – Definition of the situation: minimum of one page, single spaced, Verdana 12 point font.

Definition of the situation should be a thorough description of the organization and the present situation with detailed personal opinions and views.

PART 2 – Analysis of the Situation: minimum of two pages, single spaced, Verdana 12 point font.

Analysis of the situation should be a detailed analysis of the management process, organization, contributing factors, and other variables.

It should include detailed application of course learning objectives. The course learning outcomes for MG 371 are:

  1. The student will: Assess application of the management process (planning, organizing, leading, controlling).
  2. The student will: Select between alternative strategies to strengthen the organization’s competitive advantage.
  3. The student will: Evaluate methods to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals. Evaluation
  4. The student will: Differentiate between management practices within a domestic context and within a global context. Evaluation
  5. The student will: Contrast outcomes of managerial strategies that employ social responsibility and ethics versus strategies that do not.

When composing your case analysis consider the following concepts that you have studied in this course;

Management Skills, The Management Process, Management Ethics, Social Responsibility, Workforce Diversity, National Cultures, Managing in the Global Environment, Managerial Decision Making, Group Decision Making, The Planning Process, Functional Level, Business Level, and Corporate Level Strategies, Organizational Structure, Output Control and Behavior Control, Expectancy Theory, Needs Theory, Equity Theory, Trait and Behavior Models of leadership, Situational Leadership, Managing Organizational Change, Managing Groups and Teams, Group Dynamics, Recruitment and Selection of Employees, Communication and Information, Management Information Systems, Operations Management, And other factors.

PART 3 – Recommendations: minimum of one page, single spaced, Verdana 12 point font.

The Recommendations section should provide a comprehensive identification of the selected single best solution and explain why it is perceived to be the best solution. It also includes a complete implementation plan which thoroughly describes the courses of action and order of sequence for their adoption by all levels of management.

Case Study Rubric

You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

Case Study Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO1 _7739Assessment of the use of each of the management process components (planning, organizing, leading, controlling).

view longer description

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Exceptional

Provide a detailed and comprehensive assessment of management’s planning, leading, organizing, and controlling practices.

blank

Edit ratingDelete rating

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provide a complete assessment of management’s planning, leading, organizing, and controlling practices.

_7411

Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Provide a reasonable but limited assessment of management’s planning, leading, organizing, and controlling practices.

_2069

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >10.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Provide an incomplete assessment of management’s planning, organizing, leading, and controlling practices.

_6703

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Provide an incomplete assessment of management’s planning, organizing, leading, and controlling practices that misses major concepts or application.

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 50.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO2 _9510Critique of strategies selected and applied to create competitive advantages.

view longer description

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Exceptional

Provide a detailed and comprehensive critique of the strategies managers select to create competitive advantage.

_3693

Edit ratingDelete rating

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provide a complete critique of the strategies managers select to create competitive advantage.

_3589

Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Provide a reasonable but limited critique of strategies managers select to create competitive advantage.

_5804

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >10.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Provide an incomplete critique of strategies managers select to create competitive advantage.

_844

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Provide an incomplete critique of strategies managers select to create competitive advantage that misses major concepts or application.

_6041

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 50.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO3 _9984Critique of the methods selected and applied to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals

view longer description

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Exceptional

Provide a detailed and comprehensive critique of the methods managers select to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals.

_9444

Edit ratingDelete rating

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provide a complete critique of the methods managers select to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals.

_2658

Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Provide a reasonable but limited critique of the methods managers select to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals.

_2436

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >10.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Provide an incomplete critique of the methods managers select to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals.

_2667

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Provide an incomplete critique of the methods managers select to motivate followers to achieve organizational goals that misses major concepts or application.

_7191

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 50.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO4 _4402Evaluation of management practices within a domestic environment versus those within a global environment.

view longer description

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Exceptional

Provide a detailed and comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices within domestic and global environments.

_9818

Edit ratingDelete rating

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provide a complete evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices within domestic and global environments.

_4969

Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Provide a reasonable but limited evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices within domestic and global environments.

_9928

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >10.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Provide an incomplete evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices within domestic and global environments.

_9875

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Provide an incomplete evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices within domestic and global environments that misses major concepts or application.

_2065

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 50.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLO5 _4839Evaluation of outcomes of management practices based upon their inclusion of ethics and social responsibility.

view longer description

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Exceptional

Provide a detailed and comprehensive evaluation of the outcomes of management practices based upon their use of ethics and social responsibility.

_7846

Edit ratingDelete rating

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provide a complete evaluation of the outcomes of management practices based upon their use of ethics and social responsibility.

_3593

Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Provide a reasonable but limited evaluation of the outcomes of management practices based upon their use of ethics and social responsibility.

_7854

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >10.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Provide an incomplete evaluation of the outcomes of management practices based upon their use of ethics and social responsibility.

_396

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

© Copyright 2020 Topbrainywriters.com