Tuskegee Study Paper

/in /by

Tuskegee Study Paper

Read about the U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee in your text and on the following website: https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Provide an overview of what occurred during this experiment. What was the purpose of the experiment? Identify the ethical issues with this study. Finally, if you were a part of an institutional review board, would you approve this study? Why or why not?
Requirements:

Review the Module 2 Critical Thinking Rubric for full details on how you will be graded on this assignment.

Rubric

CRJ330 Mod 2 CT

CRJ330 Mod 2 CT
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 10.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in selected experiment or study.

 12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least three credible sources, as specified in description.

 4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates two credible sources, as specified in description.

 3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates one credible source, as specified in description.

 2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

 8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

 6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

 4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

 4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

 3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

 2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Next

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.