Describe your reaction to the readings this week (ONE ATTACHED, ONE IS LINK BELOW). More specifically, what, if anything, did you find particularly interesting or surprising? What do you think is the biggest threat to scientific integrity in psychology, and what are some ways that it could be remedied?
When responding to your classmates, provide your perspective on scientific integrity and offer other suggestions for how the identified threat could be remedied.
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/sep/13/scientific-research-fraud-bad-practice
AFTER COMPLETING THE INITIAL DISCUSSION POST, PLEASE ALSO RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING TWO STUDENTS REGARDING THE SAME TOPIC!
STUDENT ONE:
This week’s reading was very interesting, I was wondering about this topic earlier when I was doing research for my hypothesis. When conducting research it is easy to conduct biased research, meaning only finding and citing sources that work in your paper’s favor rather than also citing sources to challenge or questions the hypothesis. With this thought, I also thought about how the research may be biased because of people conducting research experiments in their favor as well. It is easy to interview or survey people who you know will answer in support or against a perspective, this is why random sampling or larger sampling pools are needed. We like to thing all of the peer-reviewed journals, research and experiments are reliable. However, as we learned in this wee’s reading they are not. Psychologists should be honest, moral and ethical to share information to better the world and people, however they are faced with challenges and put in positions where they may make questionable decisions. “QRPs are the steroids of scientific competition, artificially enhancing performance and producing a kind of arms race in which researchers who strictly play by the rules are at a competitive disadvantage” (John, Loewenstein & Prelec, 2012, p. 524). QRP means questionable research practices, this quote really made me think because the field of psychology is extremely competitive. Everyone wants to publish an experiment, make a difference, prove a point, add to science, help people, share their knowledge, etc. However, not everyone gets to. Experiments need funding, hypotheses need proof, research needs to be relevant and of interest and so on. Which is why some people may use questionable research practices or even completely falsify public statements, to get attention and more resources to keep researching. It is not right, however as we learned it is common because that is how the playing field works to have an advantage or a chance to get somewhere in their careers.
Resources
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
STUDENT TWO:
John, Loewenstein and Prelec have an interesting study. They surveyed 2,000 psychologists to ask about questionable research practices QRPs (2012). It was astonishing to read this because I thought about what a study would be like if researchers asked lawyers if they felt they helped someone get out of jail time even if they knew they were guilty, or a doctor if they feel they were involved in malpractice but never reported or never were convicted. The authors reported that approximately 94% of the participants admitted to one QRP (2012). Alok Jha’s journal states that 72% participants reported colleagues had questionable research practices (2012). This was rather surprising to see how inflated some of the results were to support a hypothesis. John, Loewenstein and Prelec’s study reported that “failing to report all dependent measures, collecting more data after seeing whether results were significant, and selectively reporting studies that “workedâ€â€ were among the three highest QRPs (2012, p. 527).
It appears that researchers are influencing their results by gathering more data to support their claim, failing to report dependent measures that would dispute their claim or using a selective process to justify their hypothesis. In terms of the “biggest threat to scientific integrity in psychologyâ€, it is difficult to say which QRP will have the largest impact on research. Consider how people react to social media, political statements, or celebrities. It does not matter the exact cause; people try to find ways to diminish the work of others even if there was only one violator or if the offense minor. Gaining trust back is difficult once lost. To remedy the situation, it calls for stricter review of data and reports. Scrutinization of journals through proper vetting is the only way to ensure these QRP do not occur again through deterring violations.
References
Alok Jha, S. C. (2012). False positives: Fraud and misconduct are threatening scientific research. Retrieved July 31, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/sep/13/sc…
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
need 4 different copies in different docs same question no plagiarism please follow instructions
/in /by JosephDiscuss the primary factors that motivate companies to expand internationally.
Instructions:
You must have a minimum of two academically reviewed journal articles sourced from the CU library to support your answer.
Please use full APA throughout (use in-text citations and a APA reference list). Post your responses in the body of the discussion area. DO NOT INCLUDE A WORD DOCUMENT.
introduction ,content ,conclusion follow this
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
logistics project
/in /by JosephEach individual will select at least two major topics from the course to research on the internet. If working as a team for the final project, at least three major topics need to be selected. Teams can be of size 3-5 – you choose your own team members, or work individually.
For the final deliverable, you or your team will search for videos of course topics you chose as applied to real companies. This final deliverable is worth 300 points. YouTube provides many such examples, as well as company websites. The videos will likely not specifically analyze how the company competes with operations and supply chain techniques, but you or your team must critically analyze the video examples with that in mind. SO, YOU MUST CHOOSE VIDEOS THAT ARE INTERESTING AND SUFFICIENTLY COMPLEX IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS.
Mainly, you should be able to discuss how this company (or companies) uses what you learned in this course to succeed in their industry.
The final project requires an individual or team submission of a report (as a Word file) of between 1000-1500 words for individuals and 1500-2500 words for teams (using Word properties to calculate). You must also submit working links of 3-5 videos that are the basis for your analysis.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
discussion estimating models using dummy variables 9
/in /by JosephDo you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
business analysis discussion 8 9
/in /by JosephDiscussion 8
Communication and Interaction skills are necessary in any business world. Based on what you have learned so far, which communication and interaction skills do you need to work on? What is your plan to obtain these skills?
How does ethics play into the work of Business Analysis?
Let’s say you are a Business Analysis and your co-worker on the team wants to make a change without going through the change request form. Would you do it? Why or why not? Does your answer depend on the type of change of what it affects?
As a Business Analyst, why is it important to be organized and be able to manage your time effectively?
Discussion 9
Based on all that you have learned, as an IT professional, explain why you would prefer to be a project manager or as Business Analyst for an IT project?
It the world of IT where the requirements can change daily if not hourly, how do you see the role changing in the next 3 years?
Are you considering joining the iiBA? Why or why not? How about just the local chapter?
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
how to answer a discussion question 2 31
/in /by JosephDoes a hospital have a different duty to an indigent person who comes to the emergency room than to a person who has insurance? Please explain your answer fully.
250 word count
Cite all sources
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
business crime discussion
/in /by JosephDo you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
signature assignment construct a presentation
/in /by JosephSignature Assignment: Construct a Presentation
As part of this assignment, you have addressed key elements relevant to your research topic; you will now finalize the application of those materials accordingly (training or webinar). Refer to your previous presentation assignments to finalize this presentation, and use any feedback/feed-forward provided by your professor and additional materials you have researched. Be sure to include all activities you will have your audience complete, along with any resources, handouts, etc., in accordance with your training or webinar.
Key points that should be evident in your presentation, at a minimum, are:
You have the option to present your oral presentation to your professor or submit embedded audio clips in each slide as if presenting. Remember, you are presenting to an audience you are either training or conducting a webinar for; therefore, consider your language and tone accordingly.
Length: 15-20 slides, not including resources
Notes Length: 100-200 words for each slide
Your PowerPoint presentation should reflect professionalism in your usage of appropriate and appealing images and colors. Note: Good presentations do not contain too much information in the slides/transitions. They include enough information to pique the interest of the participants, and then the presenter completes the presentation with their narration.
Your presentation should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights (yours) relating directly to this topic. Your presentation should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards (slides should have citations where information is used from an outside source and there should be a references slide at the end with full APA citations of all material used in the presentation).
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
current events article review chap 15 amp 21
/in /by JosephThe application of course material and an understanding of the current business environment are essential for an MBA student. In this assignment, you will have an opportunity to examine current events in business related to financial management.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
rhetorical peer review
/in /by JosephRequirement is on the bottom of the page, around 300-400 words (not include annotation) by answering two out of three questions, with annotation. The topic is provided in the next couple paragraphs.
The CP prompt requires you to have at least 3 scholarly sources, which for our purposes include peer-reviewed journal articles or books from academic publishers. This requirement is not meant to suggest that scholarly sources are the only ones that can be validly cited in a research paper; rather, it’s meant to familiarize you with how information is shared within academic discourses and prepare you to engage with research in your own fields.
So today’s assignment will ask you to work with a peer-reviewed journal article. Journal articles vary widely in their format, approach, and substance, but what they have in common is that they are written by people who have done research in the field, submitted to a journal in the field, and reviewed for accuracy by experts in the field. This process is called “peer review,” and you can read more about it here.
Journal articles are intended to be read by people familiar with the language and methods of the discipline, which means they are often hard to understand for outsiders like us. The key to reading a journal article in an unfamiliar discipline is to read rhetorically—practice the reading tools we learned about in class (set goals, research, preread, look up words, make marginal notes, skip, summarize) and use the following strategies specific to journal articles:
Note: not all journals are peer reviewed, and most of the ones that aren’t should not be trusted. Peer review is the mechanism by which we ensure that published research is as correct and thorough as possible; journals that are not peer-reviewed are often disreputable for-profit ventures that will publish any research, no matter the quality, if the author is willing to pay a fee.
Reading
Now that you’re familiar with what a journal article is and how to read it strategically, here’s the one I want you to practice on:
Expertise and Individual Differences by Anders Ericsson
Annotation
Create an annotation for this article using the format we discussed in class:
Reflection
Once you’ve read the article, write a response of around 300 words that reflects on TWO of the following three questions.
Respond to this one (required):
Then respond to ONE of these two:
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
10 2 discussion scientific integrity in psychology
/in /by JosephDescribe your reaction to the readings this week (ONE ATTACHED, ONE IS LINK BELOW). More specifically, what, if anything, did you find particularly interesting or surprising? What do you think is the biggest threat to scientific integrity in psychology, and what are some ways that it could be remedied?
When responding to your classmates, provide your perspective on scientific integrity and offer other suggestions for how the identified threat could be remedied.
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/sep/13/scientific-research-fraud-bad-practice
AFTER COMPLETING THE INITIAL DISCUSSION POST, PLEASE ALSO RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING TWO STUDENTS REGARDING THE SAME TOPIC!
STUDENT ONE:
This week’s reading was very interesting, I was wondering about this topic earlier when I was doing research for my hypothesis. When conducting research it is easy to conduct biased research, meaning only finding and citing sources that work in your paper’s favor rather than also citing sources to challenge or questions the hypothesis. With this thought, I also thought about how the research may be biased because of people conducting research experiments in their favor as well. It is easy to interview or survey people who you know will answer in support or against a perspective, this is why random sampling or larger sampling pools are needed. We like to thing all of the peer-reviewed journals, research and experiments are reliable. However, as we learned in this wee’s reading they are not. Psychologists should be honest, moral and ethical to share information to better the world and people, however they are faced with challenges and put in positions where they may make questionable decisions. “QRPs are the steroids of scientific competition, artificially enhancing performance and producing a kind of arms race in which researchers who strictly play by the rules are at a competitive disadvantage” (John, Loewenstein & Prelec, 2012, p. 524). QRP means questionable research practices, this quote really made me think because the field of psychology is extremely competitive. Everyone wants to publish an experiment, make a difference, prove a point, add to science, help people, share their knowledge, etc. However, not everyone gets to. Experiments need funding, hypotheses need proof, research needs to be relevant and of interest and so on. Which is why some people may use questionable research practices or even completely falsify public statements, to get attention and more resources to keep researching. It is not right, however as we learned it is common because that is how the playing field works to have an advantage or a chance to get somewhere in their careers.
Resources
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
STUDENT TWO:
John, Loewenstein and Prelec have an interesting study. They surveyed 2,000 psychologists to ask about questionable research practices QRPs (2012). It was astonishing to read this because I thought about what a study would be like if researchers asked lawyers if they felt they helped someone get out of jail time even if they knew they were guilty, or a doctor if they feel they were involved in malpractice but never reported or never were convicted. The authors reported that approximately 94% of the participants admitted to one QRP (2012). Alok Jha’s journal states that 72% participants reported colleagues had questionable research practices (2012). This was rather surprising to see how inflated some of the results were to support a hypothesis. John, Loewenstein and Prelec’s study reported that “failing to report all dependent measures, collecting more data after seeing whether results were significant, and selectively reporting studies that “workedâ€â€ were among the three highest QRPs (2012, p. 527).
It appears that researchers are influencing their results by gathering more data to support their claim, failing to report dependent measures that would dispute their claim or using a selective process to justify their hypothesis. In terms of the “biggest threat to scientific integrity in psychologyâ€, it is difficult to say which QRP will have the largest impact on research. Consider how people react to social media, political statements, or celebrities. It does not matter the exact cause; people try to find ways to diminish the work of others even if there was only one violator or if the offense minor. Gaining trust back is difficult once lost. To remedy the situation, it calls for stricter review of data and reports. Scrutinization of journals through proper vetting is the only way to ensure these QRP do not occur again through deterring violations.
References
Alok Jha, S. C. (2012). False positives: Fraud and misconduct are threatening scientific research. Retrieved July 31, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/sep/13/sc…
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.